Gesture Research – Data Analysis (Part 2: Winners and Tails)

04.22.2010
Dan Mauney / Gesture Research

Once all the data reduction was completed, one of the primary questions we had was, what gestures did participants create the most frequently?

To find out the answer to this question, we first sorted the data from most frequent to least frequent. This resulted in a data table that shows the gestures created, the number of people in each country that created that gesture, the number of experts and novices who created that gesture, and the total number of participants overall who created that gesture, all sorted from most frequent to least frequent.

When looking at the data, we wanted to know, statistically, which gesture(s) were created the most often (which we termed the “winner”) and which gestures were created the least often (which we termed the “tail”).

To identify the statistical winners, we ran a chi square test and compared the top gesture to the next top gesture and if there was no statistical difference between them, we grouped them together in the winner group. We then compared the top gesture to the third-top gesture and if there was no statistical difference between them, we added the third-top gesture to the winner group. We continued in this way until we found a statistical difference and then we stopped. Figure 1 describes this process.

Figure 1. Chi-Square Testing


To identify the tail, we did the same thing only we used a Fisher’s exact test (due to the low number of observations) and compared the lowest gesture to the next lowest gesture. If there was no statistical difference, we grouped them together into the “tail.” We then compared the lowest gesture to the third-lowest gesture and again if there was no statistical difference, we added the third-lowest gesture to the tail. We continued in this way until we found a statistical difference and then we stopped. Figure 2 shows this process:

Figure 2. Fisher Exact Testing

Below are all the results for all 30 actions, with the winners at the top and tail at the bottom in gray. The top winners are highlighted in yellow.

[ Accept/Verify | Back | Close Folder | Continuous Scroll | Copy | Cut | Delete | Forward | Help | Home | Magnify | Minimize | Move | Multi-Select | Open Folder | Open Menu | Paste | Pitch | Print | Redo | Rotate | Save | Scroll Down | Scroll Up | Stop Scroll | Undo | Zoom In | Zoom Out | Place Focus | Select Text ]

Accept/Verify


Back


Close Folder



Continuous Scroll

Copy

Cut

Delete


Forward

Help

Home

Magnify

Minimize


Move

Multi-Select

Open Folder

Open Menu

Paste

Pitch

Print

Redo


Rotate

Save

Scroll Down

Scroll Up

Stop Scroll


Undo

Zoom In


Zoom Out

Place Focus

Select Text

Follow this research at http://www.humancentric.com/GestureResearch

2 Comments...

  1. Nippotam

    Very intersting. It may be connected with this patent from Apple (http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2010/04/apple-wins-strategic-multitouch-music-tempo-workout-patents.html)

    I note that it will be a question for some gestures. For example tap (anywhere) is used in a lot of fonctions. Some contexts info have to be added.

    05.03.2010

  2. Gesture Research – Data Analysis (Part 3: Cultural Differences) | Enhancing Human Experiences

    [...] inspection of the data itself. We looked at the detailed results from each country, as shown in Data Analysis (Part 2: Winners and Tails), and looked for differences between countries that were explainable based on culture. We found no [...]

    05.20.2010

Leave a comment...



LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Flickr

ENHANCING HUMAN EXPERIENCES

USER-CENTERED PRODUCT DESIGN

HumanCentric provides design solutions with.a focus on products, users and goals. Our process brings designers and researchers together to implement a customized approach for user and business needs. These are our thoughts on process, practice and life.

200 MacKenan Drive
Cary, NC 27511

P 866.356.9023
F 919.481.0310

www.humancentric.com
info@humancentric.com